A site dedicated to discussing Powerisers and to sharing photos, videos and articles about them
Welcome Guest

26 Guests, 10 Users, 0 Users in Chat Trip Master, lewis, ricky35, Keltaria, Lukey, bockbockboston, joe23002, Mr Frank, ElectricStapler, hemoves.com
Please welcome bockbockboston, our newest member.
Who's in Chat?
In order to join chat, you must first register.
New to PoweriserPages?
If you're new, then it's very much recommended to have a look in the knowledge section- where a lot of your questions are probably answered.
Board Stats
Total Members: 2023
Total Posts: 76517
Total Topics: 4541
Total Categories: 3
Total Boards: 24
|
|
PoweriserPages
|
|
|
July 24, 2008, 08:18:30 PM
|
| You are currently only viewing topics in English, German & Swedish. Edit Preferences |
Show Posts
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 ... 27
|
|
16
|
Everything Else / Anything Else Powerisers / Re: Perfect springs, your thoughts about..
|
on: May 27, 2008, 08:34:35 AM
|
Well there is some improvment to be made. But the comparison you made wasn't so great I think... It's not like you push down the trampoline net a few decimeters when you jump on it, like you do with your bocks. 2 meters springs that you can compress a meter would look kinda funny though If you compress a spring with X newtons, it will wanna push your leg up with X newtons. This brings me to a question I have... ill make a new thread about that  Why is my comparisson not valid? Go one time on such a trampoline and you will feel the difference (re energy exploitation). I fully agree 32cm compression is different to 1 meter on a good trampoline (which I already outlined in http://www.PoweriserPages.com/forum/bottoming_out-t1357.0.html ) but still the point I wanted to make is that trampolines are more engergy efficient (way more than bocks). I would (as my personal guess) say when you compress bocks with X newtons they will push you up with X/4 newtons. I do not think that efficiency is above 25%.
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
Purchasing Powerisers / Choosing the Right Model / Re: Which model? Not confident to commit without further input.
|
on: May 22, 2008, 09:07:21 AM
|
|
Hi,
AirRunners and Powerizers are from the same manufacturer. The (current) AirRunner model is only designed differently. In my personal opinion I would not buy those. These stilts where not released in Europe since there were serious quality and construction concerns (search fro Up-Wing/or Redoxx on this forum, that's how they are called in Europe).
PoweriZers are OK if you get them reasonable priced and ensure that you get the latest version, since some vendors bought big bulks and are therefore still sitting on old models which had quality problems. PoweriZers are also called pro-jump here in Europe. Search on the forum, one pro-jump dealer (from ww.pro-jump.co.uk) posted pictures in order to identify if the stilts are the latest version.
I would also say that PoweriSers are the best option, but again ensure that you get the latest version (Advances 07). The only drawback are the relative stiff springs. I would not recommend a 70/90 Poweriser spring for a 60kg beginner. Learning is a pain in the a** then (but possible). PoweriZer fibre glass springs are softer there you could go slightly above your weight range. If you get PoweriZer carbonfibre springs (the black ones) do NOT (!!!) go above your weight range these are very stiff. So spring is a question of the brand also, not only the weight range. A Powerskip or 7league boot spring is softer than a PoweriSer spring or a carbonfibre (PoweriZer) spring.
I hope that helps
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
Everything Else / Anything Else Powerisers / Re: New Model - JollyJumper (Former Upwings)
|
on: May 21, 2008, 07:09:10 PM
|
The German vendor has good contacts to FlyJumper that is probably the reason why he gets prototypes very early. These stilts are tested by users of all skill levels (from beginners to pros). In general I would say that it is the manufacturers choice whom he selects for testing and there might be good reasons why and how he makes his choice. I have never seen that a car manufacturer let test everyone a prototype  . The first impressions sound positive to me, the pictures not bad either. I am curious to hear additional opinions soon (from testers).
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
Everything Else / Anything Else Powerisers / Re: New Model - JollyJumper (Former Upwings)
|
on: May 20, 2008, 01:50:08 PM
|
I do not think there are any patent issues about the cuffs. I do not know of any calf cuff patent (is there one, who would hold that? Jeff Jay, made the original calf cuff for the velocities ? I know that he made them, but is there a patent, that is the question. I have not heard of any. We were told they were not for sale in the UK due to patent issues, so we can only assume he holds a patent on them Ok that might be an explanation. But it might also have been an excuse/explanation why Poweriser was not willing/able to sell the calf-cuffs to UK. The calf-cuffs where not built/ordered/designed by Poweriser itself but by the German importer (!) as far as I know. So maybe the German importer was simply not allowed to sell to UK or USA since there other importers had an exclusive contract with Poweriser. This is only a guess (anyone may correct me) but sounds also reasonable to me. Since the German company immediately sold the calf-cuffs to many other countries when they were launched, but not to UK.
|
|
|
|
|
Loading...
|